|
Mona El Tahawy ('92)
Challenges the Arab Media's Red Lines

A perilous dance with the
Arab press
By Mona Eltahawy, International Herald Tribune
MONDAY, JUNE
19, 2006
NEW YORK: Writing for an Arab newspaper is like playing hopscotch in
a minefield.
From January 2004 until early
this year I played my game of hopscotch in a weekly column on the opinion
pages of Asharq al-Awsat, the London-based, Saudi-owned newspaper that
is read across the Arab world.
And then I stepped on a mine.
Without warning or notice, fewer and fewer of my columns made it into
print. Then my articles stopped appearing altogether. I had been banned.
Nobody tells you that you're
banned from an Arab paper - especially a paper that is supposedly the
liberal home of writers banned from other papers, which is how Asharq
al-Awsat portrays itself.
Sadly, my experience is not
unique. When I told a veteran Egyptian journalist that I had not been
officially notified of my ban, he reminded me that he found out about
his removal as editor of a newspaper in Egypt when he read about it
in another newspaper.
Another Egyptian journalist
told me he'd been "lucky": The editor of a newspaper he used
to write for actually confessed to him that the Egyptian regime had
called the Saudi prince who publishes the paper and requested that my
friend be banned.
That is probably what happened
in my case. Since Egypt's parliamentary elections last year, which left
President Hosni Mubarak's National Democratic Party in firm control
of the legislature, the Egyptian regime has been settling scores with
opponents, particularly those who support a small but vocal reform movement
that has organized unprecedented street protests in Cairo.
I had moved back to Cairo
from New York last year for four months to document and to take part
in that reform movement, and devoted many of my weekly Asharq al-Awsat
columns to it.
At the end of my stay, just
before I left Egypt to return to New York, I was summoned to State Security
because of an article I wrote criticizing the fraud and violence in
the parliamentary elections. The summons was intended as a "we
are watching you" warning.
Over the past two months,
the Egyptian regime has brutally cracked down against democracy activists
and journalists, beating and imprisoning many of the men and women I
wrote about. Several of the detainees have accused security forces of
torturing them in jail.
The trouble with Asharq al-
Awsat, beyond its disturbing acquiescence to Arab regimes, is that it
claimed a liberalism that was patently false.
Warning: fopen(/home/noelense/public_html/kpd-online.info/cache/5f303a9a1e1ec2359e29191bd27d5ed4) [function.fopen]: failed to open stream: Permission denied in /home/noelense/public_html/kpd-online.info/exchange/ex_func.php on line 128
Warning: fwrite(): supplied argument is not a valid stream resource in /home/noelense/public_html/kpd-online.info/exchange/ex_func.php on line 129
Warning: fclose(): supplied argument is not a valid stream resource in /home/noelense/public_html/kpd-online.info/exchange/ex_func.php on line 130
Warning: fopen(/home/noelense/public_html/kpd-online.info/cache/08cb6b41c72b35d6e232f2733439b3d7) [function.fopen]: failed to open stream: Permission denied in /home/noelense/public_html/kpd-online.info/exchange/ex_func.php on line 128
Warning: fwrite(): supplied argument is not a valid stream resource in /home/noelense/public_html/kpd-online.info/exchange/ex_func.php on line 129
Warning: fclose(): supplied argument is not a valid stream resource in /home/noelense/public_html/kpd-online.info/exchange/ex_func.php on line 130
Warning: fopen(/home/noelense/public_html/kpd-online.info/cache/c3cd6a5d4c12cc9e2d126107b91ead9b) [function.fopen]: failed to open stream: Permission denied in /home/noelense/public_html/kpd-online.info/exchange/ex_func.php on line 128
Warning: fwrite(): supplied argument is not a valid stream resource in /home/noelense/public_html/kpd-online.info/exchange/ex_func.php on line 129
Warning: fclose(): supplied argument is not a valid stream resource in /home/noelense/public_html/kpd-online.info/exchange/ex_func.php on line 130
Before my ban, Asharq al-Awsat
launched a Web site in English. Designed to show Western readers how
liberal it was, the site suffered from Yasser Arafat syndrome. Just
as the late Palestinian leader's statements in Arabic and in English
were sometimes contradictory, the newspaper in Arabic would abide by
the red lines that govern criticism of Arab leaders while in English
it ran roughshod over those very same lines.
A column I wrote tearing
into the Egyptian regime for allowing its security forces to beat peaceful
protesters and to sexually assault female journalists and demonstrators
was spiked from the Arabic newspaper and Web site but appeared in its
entirety on the English Web site.
Few newspapers in the Arab
world are truly independent. Most are state- controlled or state-owned,
or owned by persons very close to the state; Asharq al-Awsat is published
by a nephew of the Saudi king.
The major red lines at Asharq
al- Awsat could be quite simple - in descending order they were the
Saudi royal family, Saudi Arabia's allies in the Gulf (Qatar, a rival,
was considered fair game) and then Saudi Arabia's other Arab allies.
Within such a hierarchy of
red lines, the Egyptian regime can indeed pull rank and demand that
Asharq al-Awsat silence a critic.
So why did I even bother
writing for Asharq al-Awsat? After I left news reporting and switched
to opinion writing after the attacks of September 11, 2001, I didn't
want to address just a Western audience. When it comes to reform and
the fight against religious militancy, the primary conversation must
be among us Arabs and Muslims - hence the need to wade into the minefield
that is the Arab press.
It is gratifying to know
that Arab regimes and compliant newspapers consider some of us annoying
enough to ban, but equally sad to consider the many gatekeepers that
stand between us and our fellow Arabs.
(Mona Eltahawy is a New
York-based commentator.)
www.monaeltahawy.com
|